Boris Johnson considers new legal guidelines to focus on the Twitter censors… so ‘bunch of woke Californians can’t intrude within the UK’
- The PM was alarmed by the best way Twitter fact-checks Donald Trump’s Tweets
- He’s afraid his personal communications could also be topic to related warnings
- He needs to restrict the affect of ‘woke Californians’ on Britain’s politics
- The On-line Harms invoice is designed to guard youngsters utilizing the web
Boris Johnson is contemplating introducing new legal guidelines to restrict the flexibility of social media giants equivalent to Twitter to ‘censor’ British politicians.
In response to senior Whitehall sources, the Prime Minister was alarmed by the best way Twitter utilized warning labels to greater than 65 tweets by Donald Trump throughout the US presidential election. It didn’t, in contrast, apply any to tweets from the victorious Joe Biden.
Consequently, Mr Johnson has mentioned amending a Invoice at the moment earlier than Parliament – designed to punish social-media corporations that publish dangerous materials – to ‘restrict the flexibility of a bunch of woke Californians to intrude within the UK’, in keeping with a supply.
Boris Johnson, pictured, is claimed to be extremely involved in regards to the skill of Twitter to connect warning notices to Donald Trump’s tweets questioning their accuracy

President Trump claimed that he had received the current Normal Election in america, nevertheless, Twitter hooked up a discover claiming a number of sources referred to as the consequence otherwise
Twitter utilized greater than 300,00zero warnings to messages associated to the US election as a part of a ‘civic-integrity coverage’ to deal with ‘deceptive or disputed data’.
Trump’s supporters say that these had been overwhelmingly directed at them due to what they describe as an institutionalised Left-leaning bias on the firm.
The On-line Harms Invoice, which is at the moment earlier than Parliament, is meant to introduce duty-of-care legal guidelines to guard youngsters from disturbing materials equivalent to suicide footage or jihadi movies on platforms together with Fb and Instagram.
The measures have already been delayed due to considerations they may result in the censorship of mainstream content material on websites equivalent to MailOnline, which publish authentic information tales about associated points equivalent to terror assaults that are then shared on social media.

One supply mentioned: ‘Boris didn’t like what he noticed within the US election and has requested for extra time to contemplate the right way to keep away from the identical factor occurring to him in future’
One supply mentioned coverage paperwork associated to the Invoice are ‘sitting in Boris’s field, and are prone to keep there till after Christmas’.
The supply added: ‘Boris didn’t like what he noticed within the US election and has requested for extra time to contemplate the right way to keep away from the identical factor occurring to him in future’.
Fb additionally launched new insurance policies for the election to ‘fight voter suppression and misinformation’, which Trump supporters say was used to justify the corporate ignoring tales such because the controversy over the enterprise hyperlinks and personal lifetime of Biden’s son Hunter.
It was introduced final week {that a} new watchdog, the Digital Markets Unit, will probably be given muscular powers to guard smaller companies and to make sure that customers have extra management over their on-line profiles. It’s prone to be given the ability to levy giant fines to cease prospects or corporations being handled unfairly, and make main on-line corporations give smaller rivals entry to their huge troves of information.
The unit, which begins work in April, is predicted to turn out to be totally operational by 2022 as a part of the Competitors and Markets Authority (CMA).
The CMA has referred to as for stronger powers over Google and Fb to deal with their ‘unassailable’ positions in digital promoting and social networking.
The 2 corporations command 80 per cent of Britain’s £14 billion digital adverts market between them.