Google Bard: Still, look no further than a recent BBC interview with Debbie Weinstein, Vice President of Google UK, If you need any further reason to be skeptical of generative AI. She recommends people use Google Search to fact-check content generated by the Bard AI.
Weinstein says in the interview that Bard should be considered further of a “ trial ” more suited for “ collaboration around problem-working” and “ creating new ideas ”. It seems like Google didn’t really intend for the AI to be used as a resource for” specific information”.
Besides fact-checking any information offered by Bard, she suggests using the thumbs-over and thumbs-down buttons at the bottom of generated content to give feedback to ameliorate the chatbot. As the BBC points out, Bard’s homepage states “ it has limitations and won’t always get it right, but doesn’t repeats. Weinstein’s advice ” to double-check results via Google Hunt.
On one hand, Debbie Weinstein gives some sound advice. Generative AIs have a massive problem when it comes to getting effects right. They hallucinate, meaning that a chatbot may come up with completely false information when generating a textbook that fits a prompt. This issue has indeed gotten two attorneys from New York in trouble as they used ChatGPT in a case and presented a “ fictitious legal exploration ” that the AI cited.
So it’s clearly not a bad idea to double-check whatever Bard says. still, considering these comments are coming from a vice chairman of the company, it’s a little concerning.
Analysis So, what is the point?
The thing is Bard is basically a fancy hunt machine. One of its main functions is to be” a helipad for curiosity”; a resource for factual information. The main difference between Bard and Google Hunt is the former is fairly easier to use. It’s a lot further conversational, plus the AI offers an important environment. Whether Google likes it or not, people are going to be using Bard for looking up stuff.
What’s particularly strange about Weinstein’s commentary is it contradicts the company’s plans for Bard. During I/ O 2023, we saw all the different ways the AI model could enhance Google Search from furnishing in-depth results on content to indeed creating a fitness plan. Both of these use cases further bear factual information to work. Is Weinstein saying this update is all for naught since it uses Google’s AI tech?
While it’s just one person from Google asserting this on the record( so far), she’s a vice chairman at Google.However, also why is it being added to the hunting machine as a way to further enhance it? Why apply a commodity that is supposedly untrustworthy? If you’re not supposed to use the chatbot for important information.
It’s a strange statement; one that we hope isn’t echoed throughout the company. Generative AI is then to stay later each, and it’s important that we trust it to affair accurate information. We reached out to the tech mammoth for comment. This story will be streamlined at an after time.
